Assigned work completion

This category measures one simple thing: did you complete and turn in the work that was assigned to you for each section? It is worth 10% of your grade — and that is intentional.

"Completing an assignment matters. But proving you understood it matters a whole lot more."

Under the old model, the quality of submitted work was one of the biggest factors in a grade. Under the new model, completing the work still matters — but this category is based on completion status, not quality. Quality and genuine understanding are measured separately in your weekly meeting.

This design is intentional. If a student turns in AI-generated work, they earn completion points — but they earn very few learning verification points because they cannot explain it. A student who does their own imperfect work and can talk about it intelligently will almost always outperform a student who submitted polished AI output.

How it is scored — simple 10-point scale

Teachers enter a single score of 0–10 each section based on the completion status of assigned work. The scale below provides consistent anchors.

Score	Status	What it means
10 / 10	Complete	All assigned work submitted by appointment time. Ready to present and discuss at the meeting.
7–9 / 10	Mostly complete	Most work submitted. One or two items outstanding. Student came prepared to discuss what was done.
4–6 / 10	Mostly incomplete	A meaningful portion of work not submitted. Meeting productivity is limited.
0–3 / 10	Missing	Little to no work submitted by appointment time. Teacher has nothing to review or verify.

[clock]

Due at appointment time

All work is due at the start of your weekly meeting — whether or not the meeting is rescheduled or missed. Late work policies apply.

[check]

Self-reported first

You report your own completion status in your weekly reflection before the meeting. Your teacher cross-references this against submitted work.

[!]

Completion is not quality

This category only measures whether work was submitted. Whether you actually understood it is measured in the Learning Verification category (30%).

[0]

Zeros enforce completion

Missing or late work is entered as a zero directly in the digital textbook, which reduces your curriculum grade. There is no separate penalty here — the textbook grade reflects it naturally.

Model review — how all the pieces connect

Here is a complete summary of all six categories and how they fit together.

Category	Tier	Weight	What it really measures
Curriculum grade	Class	40%	Digital textbook quiz and test scores. The largest single weight in your grade.
Meeting content — learning verification	Class	30%	Live defense of learning in weekly teacher meeting. Scored across 4 components out of 20.
Assigned work completion	Class	10%	Simple 0-10 completion score per section. Quality verified in the meeting.
Meeting attendance	Holistic	10%	Attendance, punctuality, and preparation for weekly teacher meeting.
Regular engagement	Holistic	5%	Consistent distributed engagement via textbook logins and DDF (full-time) or textbook logins (part-time).
Faith-based community values	Holistic	5%	Weekly faith-in-action reflection demonstrating values in practice.
Total		100%	A complete picture of the whole student