Detailed Teacher Grading Guide with Examples and Prompts
4. Holistic Tier Grading Examples
Calvary Preparatory Academy — Teacher Grading Examples
Holistic Grading Model — Detailed Examples & Prompts
Page 4 of 6
Holistic Tier — Grading Examples
Holistic Tier Grading Examples
Real examples of Meeting Attendance, Regular Engagement, and Faith-in-Action across different student situations.
Meeting Attendance examples (0–10 per section)
Scored from direct observation at the start of each meeting. Three components: Attendance (0–4) + Punctuality (0–2) + Preparation (0–4).
Regular Engagement examples (0–5 per section)
Scored based on DDF participation and digital textbook login frequency. For summer, DDF is the primary measure.
| Score | What you see in the data | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 5/5 | DDF post every school day — substantive and prompt. Textbook logins spread across Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu with work continuing into Fri. No large single-session activity spikes. | Strong distributed engagement. Exactly what the model rewards. |
| 4/5 | DDF post 4 of 5 days — missed Thursday. Textbook logins on 4 days, moderate session lengths. One DDF response was brief but present. | Solid engagement with one gap. Award 4 for above-average consistency. |
| 3/5 | DDF post 3 of 5 days. Textbook logins on 3 days but session on Wednesday was very long (likely cramming). Shorter sessions Mon/Tue. | Present but concentrated. Pattern suggests work is being batched. Note and encourage redistribution. |
| 2/5 | DDF post 2 of 5 days. Textbook shows one large session Friday — all work completed in approximately 3 hours. No activity Mon–Thu. | Minimal distributed engagement. All work concentrated in a single session. 2/5 reflects the reality. |
| 0/5 | No DDF posts. No textbook login activity recorded for the section. | No engagement. 0/5. Document. This likely affects attendance record as well. |
When DDF and textbook data conflict
When DDF and textbook data conflict — for example, strong DDF but no textbook activity, or strong textbook but missing DDF — use your professional judgment and document. Example note: "Strong DDF (5/5 days) but no textbook logins recorded. Awarded 3/5 — will discuss next meeting."
Faith-in-Action examples (credit per section)
Based on the pre-meeting reflection. Three levels: full credit, partial (50%), no credit.
| Credit | Example reflection content | Why this score |
|---|---|---|
| Full credit | Selected Standard 6 (Building Community). "I noticed a classmate who seemed discouraged in the DDF this week — their posts had gotten shorter and more negative. I sent them a private message and told them I appreciated their perspective and asked how they were doing. They responded and said it meant a lot. Growth step: next week I want to be more proactive about noticing who hasn't posted and reaching out." | Specific, genuine, verifiable, names a real action, includes a concrete growth step. Full credit. |
| 50% — partial | Selected Standard 5 (Integrity in Academics). "I tried to do my own work this week and not cheat." | Submitted. A standard was selected. But the description is minimal and generic — "not cheating" describes the absence of a violation, not an active practice of integrity. No growth step. Partial credit. |
| No credit — hollow | Selected Standard 3 (Compassionate service). "I was kind to my family." | Submitted but the description is so generic it could apply to any student any week with no genuine reflection. Same entry as three previous sections with different standard numbers swapped in. No growth step. Document pattern. |
| No credit — missing | Reflection not submitted at all. | No basis for evaluation. 0. This also affects the preparation score. |
Evaluating Faith-in-Action for non-Christian students
Non-Christian students: the same evaluation criteria apply. "I helped my neighbor move furniture" for Standard 3 (Compassionate service) is a perfectly valid full-credit entry. "I was kind" for the same standard is partial credit regardless of the student's faith background. The standard is genuineness and specificity — not doctrine.